Why Online Gambling Should Be Banned In the USA
In the last few years online gambling has exploded in popularity. What used to be a small niche pastime has become almost an epidemic as there are now countless online casino and bingo sites everywhere you look.
This increase in popularity of online gambling as a pastime has led to calls for it to be banned in the USA. Online gambling is already strictly regulated in the states so banning may seem like an extreme action. Yet there are grounds for the banning of gambling websites in the USA.
For instance there are no time constraints meaning online gambling
sites like this one can be accessed and played 24 hours a day with no real limit to how long one session can last. With casinos you’ll usually tire of being outside or you’ll be asked to leave, with websites that doesn’t happen.
Then there’s the fact that other than requiring correct credit card details there’s nothing stopping kids or underage teens from signing up and playing on a gambling website as they can borrow their parents cards and run up huge debts without being discovered. Also playing with a credit card on a gambling website can drastically affect your perception of the value of money as it’s not real cash in your hands just numbers on the screen. This can lead to bankruptcy if you’re not careful.
Another issue is that the illegal gambling circuit is booming as sites based outside the US don’t fall under American regulation so there’s no guarantee of security for your sensitive information when you play on these websites.
With all these considered, banning online gambling in America does seem like a favourable course of action and one that will ultimately benefit us all.
Top of the Page
Asian-Americans And Careers in Federal Government
I saw a statistical racial breakdown of VA employees nationwide and
was not surprised to see that Asian-Americans/Pacific Islanders comprised the
second to lowest group next to Native Americans (4.2% to be exact out of a 30%
minority makeup). Frankly, being a former VA employee, I can attest that at the
Los Angeles benefits office where I worked, I noted less than 10 Asian employees
in an office of approximately 300 people for the over 5 years that I served
I felt alienated at times, both by non-Asian employees and management,
because people of my race were not strongly represented, and I think I was often
targeted or used as a scapegoat for being an Asian female as well as a young
minority with a college degree, which many employees there were not. While I
can't say that the Los Angeles federal office is representative of the VA as a
whole, I think there is a serious problem with hiring and recruitment at the VA
in general with respect to Asian-Americans. To be honest, I think the VA is
reluctant to hire Asian-Americans. I feel that people of my race are often
treated like foreigners, in my opinion, like non-Americans, at the VA. The
director of the office even felt it was perfectly ok to have a young Vietnamese
girl on an ID card in his publicly displayed museum labeled as a "prostitute,"
even though there was no factual information on the card to identify her as
such. Perhaps this mentality has something to do with the fact that a majority
of American military involvement has historically been in Asian countries and
there is a lot of resentment towards people who trace their heritage back to
these countries. Also, I feel that this mindset has alot to do with ignorance
and stereotypes about Asian women on the part of male Caucasian managers and
directors at the VA.
For those Asian-Americans who are seeking a career in federal government, and
particularly the VA, I would advise you to be sure you are comfortable in the
agency you are hired by before you decide to accept an offer of employment. I
worked at the VA for the past 5 years to support myself and my family, not
necessarily because I liked the environment. I was forced out because I was a
whistleblower who reported my superiors for the wrongdoing and injustice that I
personally experienced and witnessed. The museum incident was the first incident
I had reported, but there were many incidents as well where managers fabricated
information to make me look like a bad employee and then used these fabrications
as justification for suspending me without pay for weeks and weeks on end. The
union at my office was weak and powerless to defend me against any actions that
the managers took. The last 2 years at the VA from 2002 to 2003 were complete
hell for me and really took a toll on my health. Ironically, the managers
decided to concentrate their efforts on expelling me when there were many
employees of other races who, for many years, were not pulling their weight or
doing their jobs correctly. I would encourage federal agencies, such as the VA,
to open their eyes, stop being ignorant and intolerant, and give
Asian-Americans, like any other race of people, a fair chance and opportunity to
serve their country.
Top of the Page
Correcting Mistakes about 'ASIA' in US Government & Media
The US government as well as the media groups frequently wrongly report and describe
"Middle East" (West Asia / South-West Asia) as a separate region from
Asia, e.g., writing /saying stuff like “…from Middle East to Asia…” (which in fact they truly mean ‘from Middle
East to East Asia’). This is as senseless and idiotic as saying ‘..from
Mid-west to United States’. I am not against the use of "Middle East" but
US government must realize that "Middle East" is
really West Asia, (just like ‘Far East’ is ‘East Asia’)
and must not wrongly described or imply it as a separate region outside Asia.
This is one perfect example of US government’s mistake. During the recent
US-Singapore Free Trade Agreement (FTA), both US State & Commerce
Departments wrongly described US-Singapore FTA as
‘First between US and an Asian country’ but they totally ignore the
fact that US’s first FTA with an Asian nation is in fact with Jordan in
West Asia (Middle East). The US-Singapore FTA should only be correctly
described as First FTA between US with an ‘East Asian’ or ‘Asia-Pacific’
In another wrong use of ‘Asia’, US media often wrongly add ‘Oceania’
nations (from the Pacific) into 'Asia’ (i.e. confusing
‘Asia-Pacific’ with ‘Asia’), e.g. frequently wrongly describing/classify
Australia, Fiji, New Zealand, etc. as ‘Asia’ / ‘Asian’ when these should
be correctly described as ‘Oceania’, ‘Pacific’ or ‘Asia-Pacific’, but never as
‘Asia’ / ‘Asian’.
‘Asia-Pacific’ is an imprecise term which refers to nations from
BOTH ‘Asia’ AND ‘Oceania’ (‘OCEANIA’ means Continent Australia together with
islands in the Pacific). This alone is sufficient reason why
‘Asia-Pacific’ is NOT ‘Asia’.
Besides that, most people generally use ‘Asia-Pacific’ to refer to East Asia,
South-east Asia, South Asia PLUS Oceania (Central Asia are sometimes
excluded). However, ‘Asia-Pacific’ usually does NOT include West
Asia (Middle East)and North Asia (Russia’s Asia). This is
another reason why ‘ASIA’ must never be used interchangeably and wrongly with
US media also love to use ‘ASIA’ loosely to refer only to East
Asia/South-East Asia, while totally forgetting that ‘ASIA’ refers to much
more than just these two regions of Asia. For example, when capturing Hambali,
South-East Asia top terrorist, US media hailed it as capture of ‘ASIA’s OSAMA’, totally ignoring the fact that Hambali is only operating in SE Asia and
Asia is much more than SE Asia. The US government/media have also never
realized that as a Saudi national, Osama Bin Laden is in fact ASIAN too!
United States Government & Media – Getting ‘ASIA’ Wrong:
Why the ‘ASIAN’/ MidEast / ‘Pacific’ Error & Confusion
The abovementioned mistakes are likely due to US government’s methods of
classifying world regions. Such US style ‘regions’ are named and
defined differently from standard continental regions (e.g.
Africa, Europe, Australia/Oceania) in that
countries from the same continent may be divided up and placed under separate
(US styled) ‘regions’ while a (US styled)
‘region’ can comprise of countries from different continents.
The names and boundaries of these ‘regions’ are also NOT standardized across different US departments.
Office of US Trade Representative splits up ‘ASIA’ into three regions of ‘Asia & the Pacific’, ‘Europe & the Mediterranean’ and ‘China, Hong Kong,
Taiwan, Mongolia’. The US State Department splits Asian nations to be
placed under four regions of ‘East Asian & Pacific’, ‘South Asian’, ‘Near
Eastern’ and ‘Europe & Eurasian’.
There is nothing wrong with those US ‘regions’ per
se. However, with some Asian regions/countries are classified under US ‘regions’
with names that don’t sounds ‘Asian’ at all, the unintentional outcome is that with US’s global influence in international
politics/economic affairs, those Asian regions are less frequently being
described as ‘Asian’ / ‘Asia’. For example, West Asia/Middle East
that is placed under ‘Near Eastern’ by the US State Department, and placed under
‘Europe & the Mediterranean’ by the Office of USTR; and North Asia (Russian
Asian) & Central Asia are grouped under ‘European and Eurasian’ by
the US State Department. The US coined words ‘Middle East’ is increasingly being used
With less ‘Asia’/‘Asian’ in names of those US
‘regions’ and in words used by American government and hence US media, even the US government departments/officials
began to consider Middle East (and other Asian regions) as
separate / different from their concept of ‘Asia’ (i.e. only Eastern/Southern
Asia). This is the most likely reason why most US official documents
have wrongly describe US-Singapore FTA as US’s ‘first with an Asian nation’. With use of ‘East Asia & Pacific’ and ‘Asia & the Pacific’,
the US government and media also wrongly and conveniently consider Oceania/Pacific nations as ‘Asia’
without bothering to check the facts.
I am not against using ‘Middle East’,
‘Asia-Pacific’ or ‘Near Eastern’ but US government officials must
keep in mind that while ‘US regions’ are a little different from Continents, they must still know how to name and describe
nations and regions properly when using names of standard continental regions.
For example, it is alright to say from ‘Middle East to East Asia’ (no different to saying
‘from Midwest to New England’) but it is wrong and ridiculous to say ‘from Middle East to ASIA’ (equivalent to saying
‘from California to the United States’).
Top of the Page
A Message of Peace to Islam
I am not a Muslim, but respect people of peace. I hope this may
help undo even just a little of the damage being done in the aftermath of the
unspeakable terrorist strikes in the United States.
Some Muslim people are being verbally or physically abused by a handful of
hotheads who are acting out of anger and fear. These people represent the worse
of our society and not the huge majority of Americans. I hope you can find it
in your hearts to forgive them.
If one of the outcomes of events is that we draw closer together through mutual
understanding, peace and respect, there may indeed be a silver lining even to
Please accept my condolences for looses you are experiencing in the wake of
Top of the Page
Largest Country in Asia
I just wanted to applaud your site for recognizing countries in Asia other than those where Chinese people live. Most AA site only consider Asians to be those who look Chinese. Basically making the term elite, exclusive and bordering on ridiculous.
But, can you answer me one question, what is the largest country in Asia? No, not China or India. Russia. Russia IS Northern Asia. How can you as a site have any credibility when you omit the largest country in the continent?
Comments by Asian American Net:
Dear Audrey Poon:
Thank you very much for writing to Asian American Net. We appreciate your comments and the fact that you liked our web site. To answer your question regarding the largest country in the Asian continent, we would like to point out that, yes, "part" of Russia (more than two-thirds) is in the continent of Asia. That part, of course, is not a
country itself. As we know that Siberia alone is larger than the U.S., territorially. The larger part of Russia which is in the Asian continent is not a country by itself. Russia is usually considered a European country primarily because the great majority of its population live on the west side of the Ural
Mountains which is in Europe. Also, the capital city, Moscow, is in Europe. That's why most people, including our State Department, CIA, etc. consider Russia as a European country. Historically and culturally, the "core" Russia belongs to Europe. The only parts of the previous Soviet Union which have historic, cultural as well as demographic ties with other Asian countries are the present Central Asian countries, and we included those five countries in our web site.
I hope you will agree with our definition and the decision about not to include Russia in our web site. If you have further comments and suggestions please let us know.
Thank you again, and please write to us whenever you can.
Asian American Net
Top of the Page
Asian American Organizations |
Asian Studies Schools
Central Asia |
East Asia/Far East | Middle East/West Asia |
in General | Site Map |
Immigration Issues &
Resources | Video Clips |
Ads | Personal Ads
Newspapers | Doing Business in Asia
| Who's Who of Asian Americans